Invariance violations and the CNI model of moral judgments

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of papers have applied the CNI model of moral judgments to investigate deontological and consequentialist response tendencies (Gawronski et al., 2017). A controversy has emerged concerning the methodological assumptions of the CNI model (Baron & Goodwin, 2020, 2021; Gawronski et al. 2020). In this paper, we contribute to this debate by extending the CNI paradigm with a skip option. This allows us to test an invariance assumption that the CNI model shares with prominent process-dissociation models in cognitive and social psychology (Klauer et al., 2015). Like for these models, the present experiments found violations of the invariance assumption for the CNI model. In Experiment 2, we replicate these results and selectively influence the new parameter for the skip option. In addition, structural equation modeling reveals that previous findings for the relationship between gender and the CNI parameters are completely mediated by the association of gender with primary psychopathy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Information-Based Autonomy vs. Oligarchy.Ron Houston - 2014 - Journal of Information Ethics 23 (1):12-41.
Church of North India (CNI).Monodeep Daniel - 2023 - In John Chathanatt (ed.), Christianity. Springer Verlag. pp. 360-368.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-04

Downloads
604 (#44,126)

6 months
175 (#21,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Niels Skovgaard-Olsen
University of Freiburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations