Board Gender Quotas: Exploring Ethical Tensions From A Multi-Theoretical Perspective

Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (1):23-65 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Despite 40 years of equal opportunities policies and more than two decades of government and organization initiatives aimed at helping women reach the upper echelons of the corporate world, women are seriously underrepresented on corporate boards. Recently, fifteen countries sought to redress this imbalance by introducing gender quotas for board representation. The introduction of board gender quota legislation creates ethical tensions and dilemmas which we categorize in terms of motivations, legitimacy, and outcomes. We investigate these tensions through four overarching theoretical perspectives: institutional, stakeholder, social identity, and social capital. We outline a future research agenda based on how these tensions offer greater focus to research on quotas and more broadly to ethics and diversity in organizations in terms of theory, anticipated ethical tensions, data, and methodology. In sum, our review seeks to synthesize existing multidisciplinary research and stimulate future enquiry on this expanding set of legislation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Women on Boards.John Dobson & Mahdi Rastad - 2018 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 37 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
77 (#281,729)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?