Synthesis and Transcendental Ego: A Comparison of Kant and Husserl

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 37 (2):265-277 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper deals with the notion of synthesis and transcendental ego in Kant and Husserl. It will argue that the actual difference between Kant and Husserl’s notion of transcendental ego can be understood through their conception of time. Kant accepts transcendental ego as the kind of logical necessity for synthesizing the various temporal units which provides unity to the consciousness. However, Husserl discards the necessity of transcendental ego by giving the phenomenological interpretation of time as internal time consciousness. The interpretation of time as the flow of protention and retention synthesizes the time without invoking the necessity of Kantian transcendental ego outside the flow. Husserl’s analysis of internal time consciousness will also help us in understanding the methodological differences between Kant’s transcendental philosophy and phenomenology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bergson's and Sartre's account of the self in relation to the transcendental ego.Roland Breeur - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (2):177 – 198.
Egological Investigations.Albert Endrede Lyngzeidetson - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Some Observations on Shankara, Husserl and the Transcendental Ego.Pramod Kumar Singh - 2020 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 37 (2):257-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-10

Downloads
67 (#310,973)

6 months
14 (#215,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saurabh Todariya
Jawaharlal Nehru University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Cartesian meditations.Edmund Husserl - 1960 - [The Hague]: M. Nijhoff.
The Bounds of Sense.P. F. Strawson - 1966 - Philosophy 42 (162):379-382.

View all 12 references / Add more references