Two problems for Zylstra's truthmaker semantics for essence

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his article ‘Making semantics for essence’ (Inquiry, 2019), Justin Zylstra proposed a truthmaker semantics for essence and used it to evaluate principles regarding the explanatory role of essence. The aim of this article is to show that Zylstra's semantics has implausible implications and thus cannot adequately capture essence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-05

Downloads
513 (#52,542)

6 months
158 (#23,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lisa Vogt
University of Geneva

Citations of this work

Arbitrary grounding.Jonas Werner - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (3):911-931.
On the necessity of essence.Gaétan Bovey - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (7):2167-2185.
Ground by Status.Lisa Vogt - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (2):419-432.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. qnew York: Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
Modality and Explanatory Reasoning.Boris Christian Kment - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Essentialist Explanation.Martin Glazier - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2871-2889.
Grounding and truth-functions.Fabrice Correia - 2010 - Logique Et Analyse 53 (211):251-279.

View all 10 references / Add more references