Summary |
Essentialism
is, broadly speaking, the doctrine that objects have essential
properties. One issue here concerns the analysis or definition of
‘essential’ - i.e., what are the necessary and sufficient conditions for being
an essential property? Modalists define essential properties in terms of
an entity’s de re modal properties. And, while popular, the major challenges modalism faces have led many to embrace non-modalist accounts, which define
essence in terms of e.g., 'real definition' or metaphysical
explanation/grounding. A second issue concerns the extension of essential
properties. Debates here
center around various forms of essentialism, typically distinguished by the types
of properties in question (e.g. origin essentialism, concerning whether an entity’s origin is essential to it, sortal essentialism, about whether
an entity essentially is an instance of the sortal it is an instance of, etc.).
A third issue concerns how we know
essence facts. Tight connections with modal epistemology here seem obvious,
but, depending upon how we answer the above analysis question, it could turn
out that essence epistemology is an entirely different beast. Finally, while we
can inquire about the essences of particular instances of kinds (e.g. is Tigger
essentially carnivorous?), we can also ask questions about the essences of kinds
themselves (e.g. are tigers essentially carnivorous?), where the former
concerns individual or objectual essence, the latter, general
or generic essence; the exact relation between these two types of
essence is yet to be determined. |