Abstract

This essay engages with some theoretical issues emerging from Amy Allen’s book The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. It begins by situating Allen’s work within the broader relationship between critical theory and progress, a relationship traditionally carried on by the practice of self-criticism – an immanent and reflexive endeavour that seeks to expose internal odds, paradoxes and pitfalls of concepts and transform them from the inside. Drawing on post-colonial studies and Foucauldian genealogy, Allen’s book contributes to and enriches such distinctive feature of critical theory in its engagement with the language of progress and development. However, this essay attempts to raise two main critical remarks/open questions regarding Allen’s pars construens, specifically her claim for a negativistic meta-normative contextualism and the dismissal of backward-looking progress. Whilst Allen’s explicit intention is to avoid delivering an “abstract negation of modern morality”, her normative solutions, in both instances, risks being overly one-sided and undetermined, and eventually preserving little of that inheritance. The guiding idea of such critical analysis is the advocacy of self-criticism as an immanent task and discourse ethics as the framework for an emancipative dialogue with the subalterns and colonised subjects.