No Royal Road to Relativism

Analysis 71 (1):133-143 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A reponse to _Relativism and Monadic Truth_. I argue that while the Cappelen and Hawthorne have good responses to the deductive arguments for relativism, there are various good inductive arguments for relativism that their view can’t adequately respond to.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-27

Downloads
482 (#63,321)

6 months
89 (#73,685)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Weatherson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Generics in Context.Rachel Sterken - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
Epistemic modals and credal disagreement.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):987-1011.
Inconstancy and Content.Wesley D. Cray - 2014 - Dialectica 68 (3):337-353.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein, Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Mental Events.Donald Davidson - 2001 - In Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 207-224.

View all 22 references / Add more references