When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Backfire? Intentional Crises and the Insurance Value of CSR

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on attribution theory and expectancy violation theory, this study investigates the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on stock market reactions in the context of intentional crises, during which stakeholders are likely to attribute crisis responsibility to the focal firm. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2022, we find that in the context of an intentional crisis, the stock market reacts more negatively to firms with higher prior CSR performance. Two contingency factors (i.e., media attention and state ownership) strengthen this negative relationship. This study contributes to the CSR literature by broadening knowledge of the insurance-like effects of CSR and by identifying a “boomerang effect” of CSR in the context of intentional crises.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China.Wei Luo Qi Li - 2013 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (2):159-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
today

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Chunlin Liu
Chang Jung Christian University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references