Ein Vergleich dreier aussagenlogischer Semantiken

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (22):44-61 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we compare three different semantic theories for a propositional language, namely a valuation-semantic, a truth-set- semantic and a modal-set-semantic theory. We prove step by step that these semantic theories are mutually equivalent

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,180

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ein Vergleich dreier aussagenlogischer Semantiken.Alexander Zimmermann - 2009 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):44-61.
Der Hauptsatz der Smullyanmengen.Alexander Zimmermann - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (23):24-43.
Der Hauptsatz der Smullyanmengen.Alexander Zimmermann - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):24-43.
On the Fundamental Role of ‘Means That’ in Semantic Theorizing.Teo Grünberg, David Grünberg & Oğuz Akçelik - 2023 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (4):601-656.
The concept of truth and the semantics of the truth predicate.Kirk Ludwig & Emil Badici - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):622-638.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-25

Downloads
61 (#377,498)

6 months
12 (#278,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references