Early Renaissance naturalists worked to identify the plans described in ancient sources. But during the middle decades of the sixteenth century, naturalists instead began to describe and name plans unknown to the ancients. They also divided nature much more finely, distinguishing species that their predecessors had lumped together. As a result, they created an information overload. Dictionaries of synonyms and local flora were invented in the early seventeenth century as partial solutions to this problem of information overload.

Historians are increasingly working with material that is not only digital but has been digitized. Early digitization projects aimed to encode data for systematic analysis; more recent projects have sought to reproduce unique archival material in a manner that allows for open-ended historical inquiry without the need to travel to archives and manipulate physical objects. Such projects have undeniable benefits for the preservation of documents and access to them. Yet historians must be aware of the scope of digitization, the reasons (...) why material is chosen to be digitized, and limitations on the dissemination of digitized sources. Furthermore, some physical aspects of sources, and of collections of sources, are lost in their digital simulacra. Nonetheless, digitization and the standardization of metadata offer significant possibilities for future archival research and documentation. (shrink)

Jerry Stannard. Pristina Medicamenta: Ancient and Medieval Medical Botany. Edited by, Katherine E. Stannard and Richard Kay. (Variorum Collected Studies Series.) xxii + 324 pp., frontis., illus., index. Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate, 1999. $110.95. Jerry Stannard. Herbs and Herbalism in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Edited by, Katherine E. Stannard and Richard Kay. (Variorum Collected Studies Series.) xvi + 342 pp., frontis., illus., tables, index. Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate, 1999. $110.95.