7 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Michael F. Schober [6]Michael Schober [1]
  1.  39
    Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.Michael F. Schober - 1993 - Cognition 47 (1):1-24.
  2.  44
    Jazz improvisers' shared understanding: a case study.Michael F. Schober & Neta Spiro - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
  3.  30
    When Do Misunderstandings Matter? Evidence From Survey Interviews About Smoking.Michael F. Schober, Anna L. Suessbrick & Frederick G. Conrad - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (2):452-484.
    Schober et al. describe two studies on how survey interview respondents misunderstand interview questions. After answering a survey, participants are given standardized definitions of the questions they have just answered. Even apparently simple questions such as “Have you smoked more than 100 cigarettes?” are interpreted very differently by participants. Moreover, clarifying the meaning of the definitions with the interviewer does not always help resolve the miscommunication.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4. Comprehension and engagement in survey interviews with virtual agents.Frederick G. Conrad, Michael F. Schober, Matt Jans, Rachel A. Orlowski, Daniel Nielsen & Rachel Levenstein - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
  5.  13
    Conceptual alignment in conversation.Michael F. Schober - 2005 - In Bertram F. Malle & Sara D. Hodges (eds.), Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Gap Between Self and Others. Guilford. pp. 239--252.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  8
    Conversational Evidence for Rethinking Meaning.Michael Schober - 1998 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 65.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  36
    Just how aligned are interlocutors' representations?Michael F. Schober - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):209-210.
    Conversational partners' representations may be less aligned than they appear even when interlocutors believe they have successfully understood each other, as data from a series of experiments on surveys about facts and behaviors suggest. Although the goal of a mechanistic psychology of dialogue is laudable, the ultimate model is likely to require far greater specification of individual and contextual variability.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation