Summary |
Friedrich
Wilhelm Joseph Schelling (1775-1854), together with J.G. Fichte and G.W.F. Hegel,
is considered to be one of the three key figures of German Idealism. His
philosophical oeuvre is most commonly
divided into his (1) early period (1794-1800), (2) his Philosophy of Identity (1801-1809),
(3) his middle period (1809-1827), and, finally, (4) the Positive and Negative
Philosophy, and his critique of Hegel in his late period (1827-1854). His early
period is broadly motivated by the systematic question of Kant’s third Critique,
that is, of the unity between the realm of necessity and the realm of freedom
which Schelling approaches from the perspective of both the subject (Transcendental
Philosophy) and object (Philosophy of Nature). Schelling pursues the same
question in his Philosophy of Identity but his method in this period resembles
a neo-Platonic self-division of an independent ground of freedom and nature, the
absolute identity of freedom and necessity. In his middle period, Schelling
adds to his earlier view of absolute freedom (freedom that is identical with
necessity) the view of freedom as a capacity for both good and evil. In his
late period, he criticizes Hegel’s system according to which thought exhausts
the whole reality (Negative Philosophy) and argues for the primacy of being over
thought (Positive Philosophy).
Although
neglected for many years in the Anglophone world, Schelling’s thought remains
very much present with us today. Schelling’s view that there are aspects of the
self that continuously escape self-consciousness indicates the ongoing
relevance of Schelling’s philosophy for psychoanalysis. By assigning a unique
place to art, a place that was traditionally assigned to logic in the history
of philosophy, namely, art as the “organon” or instrument of philosophy, Schelling admits the limitations of philosophy, which for him
is no longer a self-sufficient practice. Schelling’s understanding of
identity between mind and nature resonates in the mind-body debates of
contemporary analytic philosophy, especially the works of Geach and Davidson.
His grounding of our agency in a reality that exceeds the grasp of reason anticipates
the later “existentialist” tradition. And finally Schelling’s view that being
precedes all reflection entails the idea of historical and empirical
contingency which paved the way to Marxist materialism and to some more recent European philosophies that are keen on emphasizing the limits of our
rationality. |