Pouvoir foucaldien et sélection naturelle. Une comparaison et une divergence

Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (2):318-342 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper has a triple aim. First of all, it makes a comparison between Foucault’s notion of power relations and the notion of natural selection as it has been developed, since Darwin, by evolutionary biology. A number of common points between these two notions are analyzed here, such as acting on a spontaneity, facticity, fundamental visibility and global character. By analyzing these common points, this paper attempts – and this is its second aim – to indicate and criticize several preconceptions about natural selection that still plague the comprehension, especially of non-specialists, of the notion of natural selection. Finally, by a thorough analysis of these common features, this article also attempts to indicate a point of radical divergence between these two notions, i.e. a central point that makes it impossible for the two notions to find a common application ground.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

¿ Escribió Darwin el Origen al revés.Elliott Sober - 2009 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):45-69.
Georges Canguilhem et la question de la « subjectivité » vitale.Ciprian Jeler - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 6 (2):506-525.
Darwin's analogy between artificial and natural selection: how does it go?Susan G. Sterrett - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (1):151-168.
Darwin’s Ant Problem. Group Selection in the Origin of Species.Mihail-Valentin Cernea - 2017 - Annals of the University of Bucharest - Philosophy Series 66 (1).
Chance and natural selection.John Beatty - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):183-211.
Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection.Frederic Bouchard & Alexander Rosenberg - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):693-712.
Backwards in Retrospect.Tim Lewens - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (3):813-821.
What is natural selection?Björn Brunnander - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):231-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
10 (#1,459,644)

6 months
3 (#1,464,642)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ciprian Jeler
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment.Richard C. Lewontin - 2000 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Lewontin.
The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment.Richard Lewontin - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):611-612.
Natural selection as a population-level causal process.Roberta L. Millstein - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (4):627-653.

Add more references