This interview ranges across a number of topics relevant to Dominique Lestel's thought: the history and philosophy of ethology; animal culture; realist-Cartesian and bi-constructivist ethology; biosemiotics; philo- sophical anthropology; animal studies; the other-than-human; veganism; and technology. It touches on thinkers including Bruno Latour, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Paul Shepard, and Donna Haraway.

The controversy between the medical schools of Paris and Montpellier extends roughly from the death of Barthez (1806) to the publication of the Introduction to the study of experimental medicine of Claude Bernard (1865), with a peak during which the controversy merges with the polemic between Louis Peisse and Jacques Lordat (1840-1843). This study aims to document as accurately as possible the arguments that were exchanged during this controversy, by seeking their reasons and explaining how the experimental medicine in Paris (...) ultimately took the lead over the vitalism championed by the school of medicine in Montpellier. (shrink)

The perfect compass, used by al-Qūhī, al-Sijzī and his successors for the continuous drawing of conic sections, reappeared after a long eclipse in the works of Renaissance mathematicians like Francesco Barozzi in Venice. The resurgence of this instrument seems to have depended on its interest to solve new optico-perspective problems. Having reviewed the various instruments designed for the drawing of conic sections, the article is focused on the sole conic compass. Theoretical and empirical applications are detailed. Contrarily to the common (...) thesis of an independant discovery, various elements suggest a direct descent between the birkār al-tāmm of the Arabic mathematical tradition and the Italian conic compass. Then we present the most probable transmission hypothesis involving: 1° Ibn Yūnus and his disciples of Mosul, 2° Sultan Malik al-Kāmil in Damas, 3° Master Theodore and Frederick II at the court of Sicily, 4° Andalò di Negro and Robert of Anjou in Naples, 5° Lorenzo della Volpaia, Vinci, Sangallo and Michelangelo in Florence, 6° Ausonio, Contarini, Thiene and Francesco Barozzi in Venice. (shrink)

Dominique Vermersch | : En vouant sa prétention à la scientificité dans l’affermissement de l’autonomie morale des individus, la science économique contrecarre d’emblée non seulement la primauté mais la réalité même du bien commun. Ce faisant, elle se voit contrainte à suggérer des éthiques de substitution dont les écueils en viennent a contrario à démontrer la prégnance du bien commun ; et plus encore sa nécessité, rappelée impérieusement par la réalité même des faits économiques. S’illustre ainsi le constat sans (...) concession de Jean-Pierre Dupuy, suivant lequel l’économie rationalise lourdement et retrouve ce que la morale a toujours su. | : By dedicating its pretention to scientificity to the strengthening of the moral autonomy of individuals, economic science thwarts at once not only the primacy but the very reality of the common good. Doing so, it finds itself constrained to suggest ethics of substitution whose pitfalls turn out to demonstrate a contrario the pregnancy of the common good ; and even more so its necessity, imperiously brought back by the reality of economic facts. Thus it illustrates the uncompromising observation made by Jean-Pierre Dupuy, according to which economics rationalizes heavily only to rediscover what morals have always known. (shrink)

Mamberti, Dominique I thank Archbishop Denis Hart for the kind invitation he issued to me on behalf of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference to visit Australia for the centenary of the Apostolic Delegation and to address you on the occasion of your plenary meeting. It is a great joy to meet you all here in Sydney, having had the opportunity on other occasions to meet many of you either as a group or individually in the Vatican. I also bring (...) you warm greetings from the Holy Father. (shrink)

Dominique Janicaud claimed that every French intellectual movement—from existentialism to psychoanalysis—was influenced by Martin Heidegger. This translation of Janicaud's landmark work, Heidegger en France, details Heidegger's reception in philosophy and other humanistic and social science disciplines. Interviews with key French thinkers such as Françoise Dastur, Jacques Derrida, Éliane Escoubas, Jean Greisch, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Jean-Luc Marion, and Jean-Luc Nancy are included and provide further reflection on Heidegger's relationship to French philosophy. An intellectual undertaking of authoritative scope, this work furnishes a (...) thorough history of the French reception of Heidegger's thought. (shrink)

Un hasard malicieux a fait paraître Totalité et infini en 1961, l'année de la mort de Merleau-Ponty. On se rend maintenant compte que le livre de Lévinas était le signe avant-coureur d'un tournant de la phénoménologie française. Alors que la compréhension de l'être-au-monde chez Sartre et Merleau-Ponty excluait tout recours à une transcendance de type idéaliste ou métaphysique, une orientation toute différente s'est peu à peu affirmée. Se tournant vers " l'inapparent ", la phénoménologie s'est mise en quête d'une manifestation (...) originaire ou de la révélation de l'Autre comme tel, jusqu'à se faire la servante d'un discours plus ou moins explicitement théologique. Le présent essai entend mettre en question les présupposés méthodologiques de ce tournant. A quel prix cette mutation s'est-elle opérée? Quels en sont les enjeux et les limites? Une pensée attentive à toutes les facettes de la phénoménologie ne réserve-t-elle pas d'autres possibles? Faisant suite au vif débat qu'a suscité la première édition de ce livre, Dominique Janicaud a publié dans la même collection : La phénoménologie éclatée (1998). (shrink)

Sentences, slogans, proverbes, petites phrases, formules, maximes, titres dans la presse: les phrases - sans texte - sont partout Bien qu inscrites dans des textes (une conversation, un traite, un site d information ), elles pretendent echapper a l ordre du texte, et cette simple propriete merite qu on s y arrete.Dire une phrase, est-ce la meme chose quand cette phrase fait partie d un texte et quand elle est detachee? Qui parle alors, et a qui? Comment construit-on l interpretation (...) de ces phrases qui ne sont pas prises dans la continuite d un texte? Ce sont ces questions et d autres qu aborde ce livre, passant des quotidiens gratuits a la philosophie, du discours religieux a la politique.L enonciation apparait ainsi partagee entre deux regimes: celui des textes et des genres de discours, et celui des phrases sans texte, des - aphorisations -. Mais une telle difference ne ressortit pas aux modes usuels: ces deux regimes ne sont pas deux especes d un genre proche, mais plutot une maniere pour l enonciation de ne pas coincider avec elle-meme.Dominique Maingueneau est professeur a l universite Paris-Sorbonne et l auteur de nombreux manuels de linguistique francaise et d analyse du discours.". (shrink)

Mammalian synthetic biology holds the promise of providing novel therapeutic strategies, and the first success stories are beginning to be reported. Here we focus on the latest generation of mammalian transgene control devices, highlight state‐of‐the‐art synthetic gene network design, and cover prototype therapeutic circuits. These will have an impact on future gene‐ and cell‐based therapies and help bring drug discovery into a new era. The inventory of biological parts that are essential for life on this planet is becoming increasingly complete. (...) The postgenomic era has provided encyclopedic information on gene‐function correlations and systems biology is now delivering comprehensive details on the dynamics of biochemical reaction networks in living organisms. The time has come to reassemble these catalogued items and design new biological devices and systems with novel and useful functionality in a rational and systematic manner. This is the premise of synthetic biology, a constructive systems biology discipline likely to become the life science revolution of the 21st century. (shrink)

Dominique Urvoy. son propre parti. Il s'intéresse aux disciplines intellectuelles et institue une sorte d'académie qu'il préside personnellement. Pourtant il ne retire pas un véritable enrichissement spirituel de cette collaboration des cultures et ...

It would be easy to oppose Peter Abelard and Hugh of Saint-Victor as two opposed types of masters: on one side the “intellectual,” in almost the modern sense of the word, and on the other side, a representative of the humanist, clerical and monastic tradition, soon to be effaced. In order to highlight the real significance of their divergences and the profound coherence of both historical and intellectual personalities, in this article the author investigated their social origins, how each one (...) conceived the relation between the individual and the group,and finally the way in which each appropriates earlier texts. Thus, in many respects Abelard and Hugh appear as opposite poles in the intellectual world of the twelfth century, but in a different perspective, thanks to the synthesis accomplished by their common students, as inseparable and complementary sources of what became the Scholastic age. (shrink)

Considering that the beginning of the 21st century saw the emergence of a third meaning of the word “to communicate” – to negotiate, the author sets out to explore the challenges it supposes in today’s dangerous, multipolar world, where the respect for alterity and the construction of cohabitation have become the keys of peace and war. The author concludes that the political challenge of communication in the 21st century will be to enable the peaceful cohabitation of the same and the (...) different in open societies, where economy will no longer be the only horizon of human beings. (shrink)

"Why has science placed itself almost exclusively in the service of power? Can the rational avoid being appropriated by a kind of "hyperpower"? Do other possibilities exist for the future of thought?" "Dominique Janicaud addresses the menacing explosion of power in contemporary life. Starting with a critical reflection upon the origins of the rational, he combines a phenomenology of power with a genealogy of rationality to investigate the role of rationality in linking science and technology to power. Motivated by (...) Heidegger's critique of technology, Janicaud broadens the interrogation by critically engaging with such thinkers as Weber, Habermas, and Adorno. The book sheds new light not only on Heidegger's own work but also on its relationship with the phenomenological past and its contemporary competitors - the Frankfurt school, post-structuralism, and contemporary analytic philosophy."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. (shrink)

D'" agronomie " à " physique quantique ", d'" Avicenne " à " Wittgenstein ", de " bioéthique " à " hasard " et " loi de la nature ", en passant par " neurone ", " Newton ", " Prigogine ", " symétrie "... Bien au-delà de l'inventaire des progrès marquants de l'histoire des sciences, ce dictionnaire, couronné par l'Institut de France, a pour ambition d'introduire ses lecteurs aux réalités de la pensée scientifique. Réflexion philosophique et enquête historique y (...) sont mêlées, mettant au jour les présupposés, ressorts et perspectives philosophiques des théories et des inventions scientifiques. Inédit en poche, ce dictionnaire, qui ne connaît aucun équivalent, s'adresse aux chercheurs, étudiants, ingénieurs ou pédagogues, mais aussi à tous ceux qui s'intéressent aux sciences de la nature et ne se satisfont pas du positivisme dominant. Fruit de la collaboration de près de deux cents chercheurs et universitaires français et étrangers, scientifiques, philosophes, historiens et sociologues, ce dictionnaire est publié sous la direction de Dominique Lecourt, professeur de philosophie à l'Université Denis Diderot-Paris VII où il dirige le Centre Georges Canguilhem. (shrink)