Results for 'accusation'

978 found
Order:
  1.  25
    Conspiracy Accusations.Patrick Brooks & Julia Duetz - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-22.
    In an historic moment in Dutch politics, the entire cabinet left the House of Representatives during a debate due to extreme right politician Thierry Baudet's conspiracy-laden speech. After espousing a variety of conspiratorial claims, Baudet accused the Minister of Finance, Sigrid Kaag, of being a secret agent for a global Deep State since her studies at Oxford. The accusation prompted Kaag and the entire cabinet to exit the chamber. While some MPs defended Baudet's right to speak, others supported the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  19
    False Accusations of Sexual Abuse: Psychiatry's Latest Reign of Error.Lee Coleman - 1990 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 11 (3-4):545-556.
    The problem of false accusations of child sexual abuse requires explanation. Investigators uncritically accepted theories and techniques from mental health authorities because of our society's traditional faith in such "experts." The history of this development is reviewed, illustrating the confusion resulting from a blending of investigative and therapeutic roles. Similarly hasty acceptance of unsupported medical interpretations are also reviewed. Recommendatons for reform stress a separation of investigators from mental health ideology, as well as more responsible investigative techniques.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  16
    L'accusation: recherche sur les figures de l'agression éthique.François Tricaud - 1977 - [Paris]: Dalloz.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  9
    Accusations of Heresy.Constant J. Mews - 2005 - In C. J. Mews, Abelard and Heloise. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Accusations of heresy. This chapter considers accusations of heresy made against Abelard by William of St Thierry and Bernard of Clairvaux in 1140/41. It considers how Abelard sought to respond to accusations that he was imprecise in his arguments by refining the text of the Theologia ‘Scholarium’. He felt that these accusations were based on an inaccurate understanding of his arguments. It examines the opinions of Abelard’s contemporaries and the polarized political circumstances that led up to the confrontation between Bernard (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  40
    Declarations, accusations and judgement: examining conflict of interest discourses as performative speech-acts.Christopher Mayes, Wendy Lipworth & Ian Kerridge - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (3):455-462.
    Concerns over conflicts of interest in academic research and medical practice continue to provoke a great deal of discussion. What is most obvious in this discourse is that when COIs are declared, or perceived to exist in others, there is a focus on both the descriptive question of whether there is a COI and, subsequently, the normative question of whether it is good, bad or neutral. We contend, however, that in addition to the descriptive and normative, COI declarations and accusations (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  10
    Socrates’ Accusers.Anna Kelessidou - 2011 - Peitho 2 (1):159-168.
    We have unfortunately very little information on the three accusers ofSocrates: Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon. Notwithstanding this, the presentpaper attempts to discuss the circumstances and motives that led toSocrates’ trial. Furthermore, the article deals with Socrates’ crucial standafter the verdict and considers the philosopher’s arguments as these havebeen presented in the first tetralogy.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  16
    Le accuse di Pelagio nel Commentarium in Hieremiam di Girolamo.Giuseppe Caruso - 2017 - Augustinianum 57 (1):107-121.
    In his Commentarium in Hieremiam, as well as in other contemporary works, Jerome accuses Pelagius of conducting a defamatory campaign against him by accusing him of Origenism, contempt for marriage and more generally, of wishing others ill. Did Jerome really seek to discredit his adversary, or were such accusations even circulating? This paper takes into consideration Pelagius’s surviving works and intends to give – within the limits admitted by the sources – an answer to this question, coming to the conclusion (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  65
    The lore of criminal accusation.George Pavlich - 2006 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):79-97.
    In crime-obsessed cultures, the rudimentary trajectories of criminalizing processes are often overlooked. Specifically, processes of accusation that arrest everyday life, and enable possible enunciations of a criminal identity, seldom attract sustained attention. In efforts at redress, this paper considers discursive reference points through which contextually credible accusations of ‘crime’ are mounted. Focusing particularly on the ethical dimensions of what might be considered a ‘lore’ (rather than law) of criminal accusation, it examines several ways that exemplary cases reflect paradigms (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9. A Plea for Accuses.Michael J. Zimmerman - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):229 - 243.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  10. Banal Skepticism and the Errors of Doubt: On Ephecticism about Rape Accusations.Georgi Gardiner - 2021 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45:393-421.
    Ephecticism is the tendency towards suspension of belief. Epistemology often focuses on the error of believing when one ought to doubt. The converse error—doubting when one ought to believe—is relatively underexplored. This essay examines the errors of undue doubt. I draw on the relevant alternatives framework to diagnose and remedy undue doubts about rape accusations. Doubters tend to invoke standards for belief that are too demanding, for example, and underestimate how farfetched uneliminated error possibilities are. They mistake seeing how incriminating (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  11.  86
    Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.Fred J. Kauffeld - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):245-266.
    This paper joins the voices warning against hasty transference of legal concepts of presumption to other kinds of argumentation, especially to deliberation about future acts and policies. Comparison of the pragmatics which respectively constitute the illocutionary acts of accusing and proposing reveals important differences in the ways presumptions prompt accusers and proposers to undertake probative responsibilities and, also, points to corresponding differences in their probative duties. This comparison has theoretically important implication regarding the norms governing persuasive argumentation. The paper is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   72 citations  
  12.  28
    J’Accuse: Animal Accusation in 2 Enoch.Randall E. Otto - 2021 - Journal of Animal Ethics 11 (1):1-10.
    Abstract2 Enoch 58–59 provides an esoteric and somewhat eccentric delineation of attitudes toward the mistreatment of animals within some sect of Egyptian Judaism, in all probability. Three attitudes, having to do with the mistreatment of animals in failing to feed them properly, the wrongful binding of animals for sacrifice, and possible secret sexual exploitation of animals, are delineated along with warnings regarding the effects of such treatment on the human soul at the great judgment. This linking of how humans treat (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  59
    The Accusative of Time in Amos 1: 1.Theophile J. Meek - 1941 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 61 (1):63.
  14. Un médecin accuse.Emmanuel Alix - 1971 - Paris,: M.C.L..
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Plagiarism: For the accusers and the accused.K. R. St Onge - 1994 - Journal of Information Ethics 3 (2):8-24.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  29
    The Accusative in Old Persian mām kāmaThe Accusative in Old Persian mam kama.Roland G. Kent - 1946 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 66 (1):44.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  29
    The Accusations of Conscience and the Christian Polity in John Calvin's Political Thought.D. R. Walhof - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (3):397-414.
    This article examines the meaning and role of conscience in the political theology of John Calvin. It argues that the focus in Calvin scholarship on whether conscience makes political order possible without the aid of scripture is misplaced. Although Calvin views conscience as a providential gift that restrains evil to some degree, he puts forth this claim only as part of his defence of God's right to punish all humans eternally. Conscience, that is, renders humans 'inexcusable' before God. Thus, to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  35
    How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud: View from a Different Culture.Beuy Joob & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1659-1660.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  22
    The Accused. Alexander Weissberg.Mark Graubard - 1953 - Isis 44 (1/2):93-94.
  20.  61
    The Accusative Absolute.J. N. Adams - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (02):300-.
  21.  27
    J'accuse.Vic Norris - 1997 - Bioessays 19 (4):359-360.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  14
    ‘Cheaters and Stalkers’: Accusations in a classroom.Amanda Bateman & Kreeta Niemi - 2015 - Discourse Studies 17 (1):83-98.
    This article explores accusations as collaboratively accomplished in classroom peer interactions in the absence of a teacher. The analysis shows how the children use local classroom rules and teacher authority as resources and warrants to invoke multi-layered moral orders and identities, and hold one child accountable through accusations about their behavior. The accused children are categorized in a duplicative way with morally degrading descriptions and as out-group members. This article argues that understanding children’s accusations requires understanding of how such interactions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. J’accuse Peter Singer.David Oderberg - 2001 - The Philosophers' Magazine 13 (13):48-49.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  15
    Accusing witches in the twenty-first century.Helen Cornish - 2023 - Approaching Religion 13 (3):23-39.
    There is little about globalized modern magical-religious Witchcraft that isn’t borrowed. It is well established that it is a creative response to modernity rather than an ancient continuous practice. Its inventiveness also makes it ripe for charges of religious appropriation. Complaints are compounded by claims that Nature Religions and New Age are consumerist movements, shaped by principles of alienated capitalism, fostered by ethnocentric views and coloniality. For British practitioners, anxieties about ethical practices mean they have recently turned to scrutinizing their (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  25
    J'accuse.Antonia Hofstätter - 2021 - Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 41 (2):125-126.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Double accusatives and valid inference.A. Broadie - 1982 - Logique Et Analyse 25 (98):199.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  99
    “J'accuse …”: A politics of mathematics.J. Fang - 1975 - Philosophia Mathematica (2):124-148.
  28.  23
    Violence and Accusation.Paul Dumouchel - 2024 - Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 31 (1):15-25.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Violence and AccusationPaul Dumouchel (bio)ACCUSATIONAn accusation is at first sight a triadic relation. Accusing relates three poles: the accuser, the accused, and what he or she is accused of—which is also often referred to simply as the "accusation," as if that accusation, the fault or the crime that is reproached in the person, were enough to define what it is to accuse. A person accuses another (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  13
    J’accuse…! Algunas consideraciones acerca del compromiso nacionalsocialista de Carl Schmitt.Augusto Dolfo - 2022 - Isegoría 67:15-15.
    Pese a los enormes esfuerzos que han hecho renombrados filósofos políticos e historiadores intelectuales por estigmatizar el estudio de la obra de Carl Schmitt, el interés por el razonamiento político-jurídico schmittiano ha logrado resistir a un punto tal que, hoy en día, cualquier interesado por la filosofía política o jurídica difícilmente pueda resistir la tentación o la necesidad de explorar la obra y el pensamiento schmittiano. Frente a este panorama, en esta ocasión me gustaría ofrecer algunas razones para sostener que (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  9
    Mutual Accusation: Seventeenth-Century Body and Soul Dialogues in Their Literary and Theological Context.Rosalie Osmond - 1990 - University of Toronto Press.
    Rosalie Osmond examines both literal and metaphorical aspects of the relationship between body and soul in seventeenth-century literature and their significance within a primarily dualistic philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  25
    Dialogue or Mutual Accusations?V. N. Sagatovskii - 1990 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 29 (3):62-68.
    Dialogue is the form proper to the new thinking. To resolve the global problems of the modern world and perestroika, we should have a thorough understanding of history, of all the participants in historical processes , and of ourselves. But our stereotypes are different: he who is not with us is against us; our mistakes are accidental, but the mistakes of those who think differently are inevitable. What kind of dialogue and mutual understanding is this? What we have is a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  35
    Feminist Accused of Sexual Harassment (review).Laura Duhan Kaplan - 1998 - Philosophy and Literature 22 (2):521-523.
  33.  40
    How an Orthodox Accusation Became a Source of Inspiration for Congar's pneumatology.Pablo Arteaga - 2019 - New Blackfriars 100 (1089):526-537.
    The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that due to, the so-called "accusation of Christomonism" made especially by the Orthodox observers during the Vatican II sessions, the pneumatology of French theologian Yves Congar proceeded to develop in a way that would have never happened without such a reproach. We will go through the accusation itself, its theological consequences, and then we will study the direct and indirect responses of Congar. Was Congar even aware of the effects that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  51
    The Gnostic Accusation.Jason Barton - 2023 - Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion 5 (1):27-50.
    Initiated almost 200 years ago, the accusation that G.W.F. Hegel’s philosophy qualifies as Gnostic has stood the test of time. Beginning with Ferdinand Christian Baur’s 1835 Die christliche Gnosis, thinkers have attempted to inextricably bind Hegel’s philosophical endeavors to the ancient form(s) of religious knowledge production known as ‘Gnosticism’. Two additional figures have surfaced more recently who also champion the Gnostic accusation, namely Eric Voegelin and James Lindsay. Voegelin’s 1968 Science, Politics, and Gnosticism as well as his 1972 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  61
    The Right to an Impartial Hearing Trumps the Social Imperative of Bringing Accused to Trial Even 'Down Under'.Mirko Bagaric - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):321-339.
    Accused persons who are subjected to a saturation level of negative media coverage may be denied an impartial hearing, which is perhaps the most important aspect of the right to a fair hearing. Despite this, the courts have generally held that the social imperative of prosecuting accused trumps the interests of the accused. The justification for an impartial hearing stems from the repugnance of convicting the innocent. Viewed dispassionately, this imperative is not absolute, given that every legal system condones procedures (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  25
    The Nazi! Accusation and Current US Proposals.Thomas A. Cavanaugh - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (3-4):291-297.
    In contemporary ethical discourse generally, and in discussions concerning the legalization of physician‐assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) specifically, recourse is sometimes had to the Nazi! accusation. Some disputants charge that such practices are or will become equivalent to the Nazi ‘euthanasia’ program in which over 73,000 handicapped children and adults were killed without consent. This paper reflects on the circumstances that lead to the use of this charge and offers reasons for putting the Nazi! charge aside (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  74
    How not to accuse someone of prejudice.Emrys Westacott - 2015 - Think 14 (41):21-29.
    In discussions of racism, sexism, and other forms of prejudice, two kinds of fallacious reasoning sometimes appear: the and the. The first fallacy treats someone's subjective response to a comment as sufficient evidence of prejudice or insensitivity. This fails to acknowledge that the reasonableness of the response is always an open question. The second fallacy involves dismissing what people accused of prejudice say in their defence on the grounds that the privileged always speak that way. This insultingly treats what is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  17
    D'rekutnî's Accusation of Teşeyyu'.Metin Tekin - 2024 - Tasavvur - Tekirdag Theology Journal 9 (2):1669-1699.
    In the history of Islam, many scholars who have contributed to Islamic sciences both with their works and their thoughts have been attributed to teşeyyuʻ (being inclined to Shi'ism). Dārakutnī (d. 385/995) is one of the scholars who were subjected to this accusation. Dārakutnī, who was considered one of the leading ḥadīth reciters of his period with his strong memory and deep understanding, wrote many works showing his competence in the science of ḥadīth He was also given the title (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  12
    Only the murder accusations are missing.Jens Carlesson Magalhães - 2023 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 34 (1):34-51.
    In 1848, the _Götheborgs Dagblad _newspaper was revived after a ten-year gap, and launched the anonymous submission column entitled ‘Anonyma Lådan’ (the Anonymous Box). In January and February 1849, many antisemitic letters and articles were published in the Swedish newspapers. Some letters defending Jews and Judaism were published in both ‘Anonyma Lådan’ and _Göteborgs Handels- och Sjöfartstidning_. Short of blood libel, the antisemitic side accused Jews of typical anti-Jewish stereotypes: for example, greed, hypocrisy and Jewish hatred of Christianity. Anti-antisemitic writers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  37
    Extracting Legitimacy: An Analysis of Corporate Responses to Accusations of Human Rights Abuses.Rajiv Maher, Moritz Neumann & Mette Slot Lykke - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 176 (4):609-628.
    We ask what type of neutralization techniques corporations apply to allegations of human rights abuses. We proceed by undertaking a Qualitative Content Analysis of 162 responses by ten extractives-sector firms over a period of 14 years. The firms were responding to accusations of human rights impacts documented by the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. We use Garrett et al.’s :507–520, 1989) framework of neutralization techniques consisting of denial, justification, concession and excuse to examine the responses. During our QCA, we (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  41. The effectiveness of corporate communicative responses to accusations of unethical behavior.Jeffrey L. Bradford & Dennis E. Garrett - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (11):875 - 892.
    When corporations are accused of unethical behaviour by external actors, executives from those organizations are usually compelled to offer communicative responses to defend their corporate image. To demonstrate the effect that corporate executives'' communicative responses have on third parties'' perception of corporate image, we present the Corporate Communicative Response Model in this paper. Of the five potential communicative responses contained in this model (no response, denial, excuse, justification, and concession), results from our empirical test demonstrate that a concession is the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  42.  39
    Endorsement of managers following accusations of breaches in confidentiality.Robert Giacalone, Stephen L. Payne & Paul Rosenfeld - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):621 - 629.
    Two related studies focused on the effects that a questionable supervisory conduct has on the endorsement and vulnerability of the supervisor, as well as on judgments of supervisory morality. Male and female undergraduate and graduate business students were asked to read the account of a personnel manager who violates employee confidentiality concerning certain personality test results, but who has had a previous record of increasing or decreasing productivity. The studies revealed varying patterns of leadership endorsement, vulnerability, and judgments of morality (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  43. (1 other version)Plato's Greatest Accusation against Poetry.Elizabeth Belfiore - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 9:39.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  44.  16
    Discourses of defense: Self and other positioning in public responses to accusations of corruption in Jordan.Muhammad A. Badarneh - 2020 - Discourse Studies 22 (4):399-417.
    Public accusations of corruption leveled against public figures and institutions in Jordan have recently become a prominent feature of public discourse in the country. Informed by positioning theory as an analytical framework, this study focuses on public responses to such accusations through a discourse analysis of two major apologetic statements, or apologiae, issued in Jordan in 2018 and 2019: one by a controversial former royal court chief and minister of planning in response to public accusations of corruption and appropriation of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  25
    Book review: Feminist accused of sexual harassment. [REVIEW]Jane Gallop - 1998 - Philosophy and Literature 22 (2).
  46.  30
    Responses of Authors Accused of Plagiarism by Journal Editors.Somsri Wiwanitkit & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):309-311.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  15
    The Problem Of Possesive-Accusative Suffix In Turkish A Case Of The Dede Qorkut.Cahit BAŞDAŞ - 2008 - Journal of Turkish Studies 3:6-13.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  27
    Chauvinism – a misdirected accusation: A reply.Benny Shanon - 1991 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (3):369–371.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  56
    Tschirnhaus et l'accusation de spinozisme : la polémique avec Christian Thomasius.Jean-Paul Wurtz - 1980 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 78 (40):489-506.
  50. Jane Gallop, Feminist Accused of Sexual Harassment.P. Benson - forthcoming - Radical Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 978