It is generally agreed that the major contribution of Lukács to twentieth century thought is to have foregrounded in philosophical inquiry the questions of alienation and reification. However, while the secondary literature on the question has been almost exclusively focused on Lukács's early work, History and Class Consciousness, the present article addresses the wealth of innovative perspectives to be found in his Aesthetics, and in particular in his Ontology of Social Being. The second part of the article addresses the affinities (...) with the Sartrean philosophy and proposes a confrontation with the Heideggerrian analysis of alienation, which is rarely granted a critical treatment in its own rights. (shrink)

This essay confronts Heidegger′s and Lukács′s thinking regarding several fundamental ontological questions. Some considerations are presented on the concepts of “In-der-Welt-Sein” and “das Ansichseiende” , on the role of labour in the evolution of mankind, on the importance of causality for both philosophers and – last but not least – on the relationship between science and philosophy. Special emphasis is given to the Heideggerian concept of “Geworfenheit” and also to Lukács′s critique of that concept. The opposition between Heidegger′s hermeneutics and (...) Lukács′s ontological-genetic method takes centre stage in this confrontation. (shrink)

Trata-se de manuscrito inédito enviado pelo autor para Juarez Torres Duayer e Ester Vaisman no ano de 2009, e que fazia parte da versão inicial provisória do livro Por que Lukács?, ainda em elaboração naquela época. Não se conhecem as razões que fizeram com que o autor suprimisse o epílogo, concebido, pelo menos inicialmente, como capítulo final da versão que, finalmente, veio a ser publicada em Paris pela editora da Maison des sciences de l’homme no ano de 2016. A tradução (...) para o português, recém-publicada pela Boitempo editorial, ao seguir o original francês efetivamente publicado, também não traz o que Tertulian intitulou provisoriamente de epílogo. O fato é que Tertulian tratou do tema em dois capítulos da edição publicada. São eles: “Caldeirão ideológico romeno” e “Encontros com Cioran”, mas nenhum deles tratou o assunto com a profundidade e a agudeza do manuscrito, ora publicado pela Verinotio. O comitê editorial da revista resolveu levá-lo a público dada a importância da análise e da denúncia ali contidas, e por se tratar de assunto que atualmente é da mais alta importância do ponto de vista teórico-ideológico, não apenas nos países do leste europeu. (shrink)

Lukács' book The Young Hegel can be read in many ways. We can read it exclusively as a history of philosophy and evaluate the soundness of its method. We can ask, for example, whether Lukács is correct in attributing a decisive role in the genesis of the Hegelian dialectic to Hegel's progressive discovery of the contradictions in developing bourgeois society, especially to his discovery of the economic facts which split that society. The novelty of the Lukacsian insistence on the role (...) of Hegel's economic conceptions provoked violent reactions from the very beginning. Alluding to the publication of Lukács' book (whose subtitle is “On the relations between Dialectics and the Economy”). (shrink)

Lukács avait 86 ans, il était atteint d’une maladie grave, un cancer du poumon, les forces commençaient à l’abandonner au point qu’il n’arrivait plus à lire et à corriger le manuscrit de son dernier travail philosophique, les Prolégomènes à une ontologie de l’être social, achevé en automne 1970, lorsqu’il a accepté la sollicitation des..

La rencontre entre la philosophie de Lukács et la pensée ontologique de Nicolai Hartmann est un sujet rarement abordé dans l’historiographie philosophique. Le contact avec les grands travaux ontologiques de Hartmann a joué pourtant un rôle décisif dansla genèse de l’Ontologie de l’être social, l’ouvrage qui a couronné le long parcours intellectuel et politique de Lukács. Le texte se propose d’éclaircir l’affinité profonde qui se fait jour entre deux pensées que tout semblait séparer. Hartmann cultivait la philosophia perennis, élevée au-dessus (...) des contingences socio-historiques, Lukács, philosophe engagé dans les batailles du siècle, bâtissait une œuvre saturée de pensée marxienne. Il existe néanmoins de significatifs traits d’union : la critique de la phénoménologie de Husserl, la critique des courants néo-positivistes et surtout de fortes réserves à l’égard de Heidegger. (shrink)